12 Weird Lawsuits Filed by People

By 3 weeks ago

Over the years, we have heard about multiple lawsuits filed against people and organizations for a variety of reasons, while some of them have been sensible, some have been outright bizarre and silly. Here are 12 weird lawsuits that have been filed by people which will make you wonder if these lawsuits are for real. Sadly, they are. But hey, some of them are so silly they can bring quite a chuckle. Read on!

ADVERTISEMENTS

1. Jackie Coogan sued his mother for spending all the earnings he made as a child actor.

Jackie Coogan with his mother. Image credits: Greenbriarpictureshows.blogspot.com, Jackie Coogan Productions / First National Pictures / Shirley Vance Martin/Exhibitors Herald via Internet Archive

Jackie Coogan was a child actor who began acting during the silent film era at an early age of four. He was discovered by Charlie Chaplin, and the film The Kid was one of the most significant movies in his career. He was one of the first child stars, and he was heavily merchandised.

It was estimated that Coogan earned $3 to $4 million as a child star. He believed his fortune was well preserved. But, when he turned 21 in October 1935, he found that his mother and stepfather spent all his earnings on diamonds, furs, and cars. When confronted, Coogan’s mother claimed that they made no promises to give him anything. Coogan sued his mother in 1938, but after the legal expenses, he was awarded a mere $126,000, from the $250,000 that remained from his earnings.

This case led to the California Child Actor’s Bill, which is now commonly referred to as “The Coogan Law,” wherein the employer of the actor should set aside 15% of the earnings in a trust. (source)

ADVERTISEMENTS

2. A bear was sued for stealing honey.

Macedonian beekeeper sued a bear for stealing honey.

In 2008, a bear was sued for continuously stealing honey from a Macedonian beekeeper, Zoran Kiseloski. After an entire year of futile attempts to keep the bear away from his beehives by lighting up the area or by playing thumping turbo-folk music to keep the bear away, the exasperated beekeeper went to court. The court found the bear guilty, but since the bear had no owner and was classified as a protected species, the court ordered the state to pay $3,500 dollars for the damages caused to the beehives. (source)

3. A woman sued a dead man’s estate because his flying body parts injured her.

Hiroyuki Joho. Image credits: Dailymail, Clay Gilliland/Flickr

In 2008, 18-year-old Hiroyuki Joho ran in front of an approaching Amtrak train in an effort to catch an inbound Metra train due to arrive in five minutes. After the collision with the Amtrak train traveling at 70 mph, a part of his body flew to the platform and struck a fellow commuter, Gayane Zokhrabov, and knocked her to the ground. Her leg and wrist were broken and her shoulder was injured.

The 58-year-old, Gayane Zokhrabov, sued Joho’s estate for her injuries. Though the court initially dismissed the case saying that the teenager could not have anticipated injuring the commuter, the case was appealed with the theory of “If you do something as stupid as this guy did, you have to be responsible for what comes from it.” Joho’s mother also filed a lawsuit against the Metra for not announcing the delay in the train and for not displaying a warning that the inbound train was an express train. Court records show that the case was settled for an undisclosed amount. (source)

ADVERTISEMENTS

4. A burglar sued a farmhouse owner for setting up a booby trap that injured him.

A burglar broke into a farmhouse.

The Briney’s had inherited an old farmhouse in Mahaska County, Iowa, but left the farmhouse vacant for nearly ten years. Though it was vacant and in poor condition, there were constant burglaries. To avoid this, Edward Briney set up a booby trap in one of the bedrooms with a spring-loaded shotgun that was rigged to fire when the door was opened. The shotgun was aimed to shoot at an intruder’s legs.

A month later, when Marvin Katko broke into the farmhouse, he triggered the shotgun and it injured him in his right ankle. He was fined and arrested for petty larceny, but he then sued the farmhouse owners for his injuries. The court ruled that using such harmful methods when the property was vacant was unreasonable, and that “the law has always placed a higher value upon human safety than upon mere rights in property.” The court awarded Katko $30,000 in damages.

Four years after the case when Briney was asked if he would change anything about the scenario, he stated “I’d have aimed that gun a few feet higher.” (source)

ADVERTISEMENTS

ADVERTISEMENTS

1 of 3 Next

Leave a Comment

This website uses cookies.